Detecting Parkinson’s Disease Using CNN- A Deep Learning Approach

Main Article Content

Nayana R
Dr. Venkatesh Prasad

Abstract

These days, a fundamental assessment sort in clinical affiliations biometrics is finding careful biomarkers that award settling on clinical choice assistance instruments. Parkinson's contamination (PD) is a tireless and reformist illness that impacts a colossal number of people all throughout the planet. Regardless of the way that it is exceptionally easy to remember someone affected by PD when the illness shows itself (for instance shudders, progressiveness of improvement and freezing-of-step), most works have focused in analysing the working arrangement of the ailment in its starting stages. In such cases, prescriptions can be coordinated to grow the individual fulfilment of the patients. Since the beginning, it is outstanding that PD patients feature the micrography, which is related to muscle resoluteness and tremors. In that limit, most tests to distinguish Parkinson's Disease use physically composed assessment, where the individual is drawn nearer to play out some predefined tasks, for instance, drawing twisting and meanders on a format paper. Subsequently, an expert examination the drawings to describe the reformist of the disease. In this work, we are interested in assisting specialists with such tasks by developing AI systems that can take real data from tests and suggest a possibility of a given person being impaired by PD based on their physically composed capacities.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

O’Neil King, R. Biometrics in Healthcare; Biometrics Research Group, Inc.: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2017; Available online: https://www.biometricupdate.com/wpcontent/uploads/2017/04/special-report-globalbiometrichealthcare.pdf (accessedon 11 August 2019).

Jankovic, J. Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features and diagnosis.J Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008, 79, 368–376. [CrossRef] [PubMed].

Contreras-Vidal, J.L.; Stelmach, G.E. E_ects of parkinsonism on motor control. Life Sci. 1995, 58, 165–176.[CrossRef].

Tysnes, O.B.; Storstein, A. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 2017, 124, 901–905.[CrossRef] [PubMed]

SalimLahmiri.; AmirShmuel.; Detection of Parkinson’s disease based on voice patterns ranking and optimized support vector machine. 2018

rishtiGroverSaloni; BhartiaAkshama; AbhilashaYadav;SeejaK.R; Predicting Severity Of Parkinson's Disease Using Deep Learning. 2018

André A. Spadoto; Rodrigo C. Guido; Felipe L. Carnevali; João P. Papa.; André F. Pagnin; Alexandre X. Falcão; Improving Parkinson's disease identification through evolutionary-based feature selection. 2011

Clayton R.Pereira; Danilo R.Pereira; Gustavo H.Rosa; Victor H.C.Albuquerque; Silke A.T.Weber; Handwritten dynamics assessment through convolutional neural networks: An application to Parkinson's disease identification. 2018

Luis Claudio Sugi Afonso; Clayton reginaldo Pereira; Weber; Christian Hook; João Paulo Papa.; Parkinson's disease identification through optimum-path forest. 2017

Rizzo, G.; Copetti, M.; Arcuti, S.; Martino, D.; Fontana, A.; Logroscino, G. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis ofParkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2016, 86, 566–576. [CrossRef] [PubMed].

Ammenwerth, E.; Nykanen, P.; Rigby, M.; de Keizer, N. Clinical decision support systems: Need for evidence, need for evaluation. Artif. Intell. Med. 2013, 59, 1–3.

Dreiseitl, S.; Binder, M. Do physicians value decision support? A look at the effect of decision support systems on physician opinion. Artif. Intell. Med. 2005, 33, 25–30. [CrossRef]

Mattison, H.A.; Stewart, T.; Zhang, J. Applying bioinformatics to proteomics: Is machine learning the answer to biomarker discovery for PD and MSA? Mov. Disord. 2012, 27, 1595–1597. [CrossRef]

Lahmiri, S.; Shmuel, A. Detection of Parkinson’s disease based on voice patterns ranking and optimized support vector machine. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2018, 49, 427–433. [CrossRef]

Gómez-García, J.A.; Moro-Velázquez, L.; Godino-Llorente, J.I. On the design of automatic voice condition analysis systems. Part I: Review of concepts and an insight to the state of the art. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2019, 51, 181–199. [CrossRef]

Gómez-García, J.A.; Moro-Velázquez, L.; Godino-Llorente, J.I. On the design of automatic voice condition analysis systems. Part II: Review of speaker recognition techniques and study on the effects of different variability factors. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2019, 48, 128–143. [CrossRef]

Viteckova, S.; Kutilek, P.; Svoboda, Z.; Krupicka, R.; Kauler, J.; Szabo, Z. Gait symmetry measures: A review of current and prospective methods. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2018, 42, 89–100. [CrossRef]

San-Segundo, R.; Navarro-Hellín, H.; Torres-Sánchez, R.; Hodgins, J.; De la Torre, F. Increasing Robustness inthe Detection of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease. Electronics 2019, 8, 119. [CrossRef]

McLennan, J.E.; Nakano, K.; Tyler, H.R.; Schwab, R.S. Micrographia in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol. Sci. 1972, 15, 141–152. [CrossRef]

Zham, P.; Arjunan, S.P.; Raghav, S.; Kumar, D.K. Ecacy of Guided Spiral Drawing in the Classification of Parkinson’s Disease. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2018, 22, 1648–1652. [CrossRef]

Potgieser, A.R.; Roosma, E.; Beudel, M.; de Jong, B.M. The eect of visual feedback on writing size in parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2015, 2015, 857041. [CrossRef]

Drotár, P.; Mekyska, J.; Rektorová, I.; Masarová, L.; Smékal, Z.; Faundez-Zanuy, M. Evaluation of handwriting kinematics and pressure for differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Artif. Intell. Med. 2016, 67, 39–46.

Letanneux, A.; Danna, J.; Velay, J.L.; Viallet, F.; Pinto, S. From micrographia to Parkinson’s disease dysgraphia.Mov. Disord. 2014, 29, 1467–1475. [CrossRef]

Thomas, M.; Lenka, A.; Kumar Pal, P. Handwriting Analysis in Parkinson’s Disease: Current Status and Future Directions. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract. 2017, 4, 806–818. [CrossRef]

Rosenblum, S.; Samuel, M.; Zlotnik, S.; Erikh, I.; Schlesinger, I. Handwriting as an objective tool for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis. J. Neurol. 2013, 260, 2357–2361. [CrossRef]

Impedovo, D.; Pirlo, G. Dynamic Handwriting Analysis for the Assessment of Neurodegenerative Diseases:A Pattern Recognition Perspective. IEEE Rev. Biomed. 2019, 12, 209–220. [CrossRef]

Impedovo, D.; Pirlo, G. Chapter 7: Online Handwriting Analysis for the Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease: Overview and Experimental Investigation. In Series on Language Processing, Pattern Recognition, and Intelligent Systems. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence; World Scientific Publishing:Singapore, 2019; pp. 113–128.

Ashwinkumar.U.M and Dr. Anandakumar K.R, "Predicting Early Detection of cardiac and Diabetes symptoms using Data mining techniques", International conference on computer Design and Engineering, vol.49, 2012.

van Drempt, N.; McCluskey, A.; Lannin, N.A. A review of factors that influence adult handwriting performance. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 2011, 58, 321–328.

Kotsavasiloglou, C.; Kostikis, N.; Hristu-Varsakelis, D.;Arnaoutoglou, M. Machine learning-based classification of simple drawing movements in Parkinson’s disease. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2017, 31, 174–180. [CrossRef]

Gallicchio, C.; Micheli, A.; Pedrelli, L. Deep Echo State Networks for Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1802.06708.