Shubhi Shrivastava, Iti Mathur, Nisheeth Joshi


Ontologies bolsters data disclosure, sharing and reuse among people and enable semantic interoperability between PC based structures. To develop correspondences between data thoughts addressed in Ontologies. Once in a while the correspondence between the client and PC is in various language, which is extremely hard to comprehend for both. Ontology matching is at the center of overseeing Cross Lingual on the semantic web. In this paper, we present a way to deal with take care of the issue of multilingualism on the semantic web, in view of Syntactic matching . To determine linguistic issue, two Ontologies (one in English and one in Hindi) of same space, interior portrayal, number of matching algorithm dependent on Syntactic method (Edit distance (Levenshteindistance LD)), and Machine Translator.


Cross Lingual Ontology Matching, Syntactic Matching, Edit Distance Algorithm, Fuzzy Implication, Machine Translation

Full Text:



J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko, Ontology matching. Heidelberg (DE): Springer-Verlag, 2007.

D. Ngo and Z. Bellahsene, YAM++ : A multi-strategy based approach for ontology matching task," in Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management -18th International Conference, EKAW 2012, Galway City, Ireland, October 8-12, 2012. Proceedings, pp. 421{425, 2012.

P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat, Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges," Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 158{176, 2013.

D. Spohr, L. Hollink, and P. Cimiano, A machine learning approach to multi-lingual and cross-lingual ontology matching," in The Semantic Web{ISWC 2011, pp. 665{680, Springer, 2011.

D. Faria, C. Pesquita, E. Santos, M. Palmonari, I. F. Cruz, and F. M. Couto, The agreementmakerlight ontology matching system," in On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Conferences, pp. 527{541, Springer, 2013.

Cruz, I. F., Stroe, C., Caci, M., Caimi, F., Palmonari, M., Antonelli, F. P., Keles, U. C. 2010. Using AgreementMaker to Align Ontologies for OAEI 2010. Fifth International Workshop on Ontology Matching, co-located with the International Semantic Web Conference, Shanghai, China.

Ruiz, E. J., & Grau, B. C. 2011. LogMap: Logic-based and Scalable Ontology Matching. In the 10th International Semantic Web Conference

Jérôme, D. 2011. AROMA results for OAEI 2011. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Ontology Matching.

Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., Swami, A. 1993. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. Vol 22 (2), ACM.

Jorge, G., Bernad, J., Mena, E. 2011. Ontology matching with CIDER: evaluation report for OAEI 2011. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Ontology Matching.

Peng, W., Xu, B. 2008. Lily: Ontology alignment results for OAEI 2008. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Ontology Matching.

Juanzi, L., Tang, J., Li, Y., & Luo, Q. 2009. Rimom: A dynamic multistrategy ontology alignment framework. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 21(8), pp 1218-1232.

Fayçal, H., Safar, B., Niraula, N.B., Reynaud, C. 2010. TaxoMap alignment and refinement modules: Results for OAEI 2010. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Ontology Matching.

DuyHoa, N., Bellahsene, Z. 2012. YAM++: a multi-strategy based approach for ontology matching task. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 421-425.

Mathur, I., Joshi, N., Darbari, H., Kumar, A. 2014. Shiva: A Framework for Graph Based Ontology Matching. International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol 87.

Benjamins, V., Contreras, J., Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Six challenges for the semantic web. In: Special Interest Group onSemantic Web and Information Systems (SIGSEMIS Buelletin).(2004).

MarouenKachroudi, Sami Zghal, and Sadok Ben Yahia, Using Linguistic Resource for Cross-Lingual Ontology Alignment. iJES ‒ Volume 1, Issue 1, August 2013.

Jorge Gracia and Kartik Asooja,”Monolingual and cross-lingual ontology matching with CIDER-CL: evaluation report for OAEI 2013”, proceedings of the 8th international conference on ontology matching- volume 1111.

Iti Mathur, Nisheeth Joshi, Hemant Darbari, Ajai Kumar “Shiva++: An Enhanced Graph based Ontology Matcher”, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 92 – No.16, April 2014.

Abdel Nasser Tigrine, Zohra Bellahsene, Konstantin todorov,”LYAM++ results for OAEI 2015-hal-Iirmm.ccsd.cnrs.Fr.

WarithEddine DJEDDI, Mohamed Tarek Khadir and Sadok BENYAHIA, ”XMap: results for OAEI 2015”, OM 2015.

Abdel Nasser Tigrine, Zohra Bellahsene, Konstantin Todorov,” Light-weight Cross-lingual Ontology Matching with LYAM++”,HAL Id: lirmm-01408025, Submitted on 2 Dec 2016.

AbderrahmaneKhiat, “CroLOM results for OAEI 2017”, OM 2017.

Daniel Faria, Catia Pesquita, Booma SowkarthigaBalasubramani,” Results of AML participation in OAEI 2018”, OM 2018.

Shimaa Ibrahim, Said Fathalla, Hamed ShariatYazdi, Jens Lehmann,andHajiraJabeen,” OECM: A Cross-lingual Approach for Ontology Enrichment”, 2019.

Nisheeth Joshi, Hemant Darbari, and Iti Mathur,”Human and Automatic Evaluation of English to Hindi Machine Translation Systems”, Advances in computer science, engineering and application, pp 423-432. 2012.

Rashmi Gupta ,Nisheeth Joshi and Iti Mathur,” ANALYSING QUALITY OF ENGLISH-HINDI MACHINE TRANSLATION ENGINE OUTPUTS USING BAYESIAN CLASSIFICATION”, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications (IJAIA), Vol. 4, No. 4, July 2013

Levenshtein, V.I. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady. Vol. 10.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science